Skip to content
← All posts

Your Market Is Not the National Average. How to Check

6 min read
An aerial view of a small town and its neighbourhoods
Contents
  1. 1. Your own trailing occupancy, by care level
  2. 2. Days-on-market for your hardest units
  3. 3. The count of competitors bidding on your terms
  4. 4. Cost per click, tracked as a trend not a number
  5. 5. Local search volume against your catchment
  6. 6. Your staffing gap, expressed as beds
  7. Reading the results
  8. The one that surprises people
  9. The caveat

Fifteen primary markets are already above 90% occupancy. Plenty of others are still in the low 80s. The national average of 89.9% describes almost none of them, and a marketing plan built on it will be wrong in one direction or the other.

The useful question is not what near-90% national occupancy means for the industry. It is which of three constraints is actually binding in your building: demand, rate, or staff. Six checks answer it.

1. Your own trailing occupancy, by care level

Start with your building, not the market.

Pull twelve months of occupancy split by care level, not blended. A community at 91% overall can be at 97% in assisted living and 78% in memory care, and those two need opposite briefs. The blended number is the one that hides the problem you are paying to solve.

If any care level has moved less than two points in twelve months, that is the one to look at first.

2. Days-on-market for your hardest units

Take the three floor plans that take longest to fill and measure the median days from vacancy to move-in over the last year.

If that number is stable while overall occupancy rises, you do not have a demand problem. You have an inventory-mix problem, and more leads will not fix it. If it is climbing, demand is genuinely softening in your segment regardless of what the national figure says.

3. The count of competitors bidding on your terms

This is the cheapest signal available and almost nobody checks it.

Look at the paid results for [care type] near me and [care type] in [your town] on a phone, not a desktop, at 9pm. Count the distinct operators. Then check again a month later.

A rising count is your cost per click’s future. It is also the single best early warning that a competitor has just hired an agency.

4. Cost per click, tracked as a trend not a number

In an assisted living PPC account, an absolute CPC tells you very little. The direction tells you a lot.

If your CPC is rising while your impression share holds, competition is intensifying and you are keeping up. If CPC is rising while impression share falls, you are being outbid and losing ground quietly, and that combination is the one that shows up as a bad quarter three months later.

Track both together, monthly, alongside the rest of your marketing measurement. Neither number means much alone.

5. Local search volume against your catchment

Search volume for senior living terms is roughly proportional to the 75-plus population in the catchment, and that population is not growing evenly. Some metros are seeing double-digit growth in the age band; others are flat.

If volume is flat and competitor count is rising, no amount of optimisation produces growth. You are fighting for share of a fixed pool, and the win comes from conversion rate and speed of response rather than reach. That is a landing page and follow-up problem, not a media problem.

6. Your staffing gap, expressed as beds

This is the check most marketing plans skip entirely.

Take open direct-care roles, multiply by the residents each role supports, and you get the number of beds you cannot safely fill today. If that number is larger than your current vacancy, your constraint is staff, not demand, and every dollar of census marketing is buying a waiting list you cannot admit.

With turnover running above 35% industry-wide, this is the binding constraint far more often than operators expect. It is also why we run census and recruitment on one programme rather than treating them as separate budgets.

Reading the results

What you findWhat it meansWhat to do
Occupancy flat in one care level onlyMix problemRe-brief that care level separately
Days-on-market stable, occupancy risingInventory problemTarget the hard units, not the building
Competitor count rising, CPC rising, share holdingHealthy competitionHold budget, protect share
CPC rising, impression share fallingBeing outbidRaise budget or narrow targeting
Volume flat, competitors upFixed poolCompete on conversion, not reach
Staffing gap exceeds vacancyStaff-constrainedMove budget to recruitment

The one that surprises people

More than half the communities we run this on come back staff-constrained rather than demand-constrained, and they came to us asking for more leads.

That is an uncomfortable finding to deliver, and it is the reason the free audit reports what we find rather than what was requested. Selling census campaigns to a building that cannot staff its current beds is easy, profitable, and useless.

The caveat

These six checks describe your position. They do not predict it.

A submarket can change inside two quarters when one competitor opens, one closes, or one starts advertising properly. Re-run checks 3 and 4 monthly; the rest quarterly is enough.

Source: Occupancy and market-level figures from NIC MAP Vision, Q1 and Q2 2026. Turnover from the 2026 State of the Senior Living & Care Workforce report. How we measure and where these methods are weak is on the methodology page.

The census memo

One email a month. Numbers you can use on Monday.

What we are seeing across 100+ communities: what cost per move-in is actually running, which channels are softening, and what changed in Google and Meta that will hit your census. No roundups, no reheated industry news.

  • Monthly, not weekly
  • Unsubscribe in one click
  • We never sell the list
Get a Free Audit